Ball And Stick Model Disadvantages

They completely ignore what chemists know from quantum mechanics about the nature of matter at the subatomic level.
Ball and stick model disadvantages. The difference between them is that instead of sticks representing bonds as in the ball and stick model the spheres that represent atoms are fused together and the size of the sphere represents the size of the actual atom. You get no real picture of the actual size of atoms and bond lengths they are fixed and expanded in the ball and stick view 0 1 0 login to reply the answers post. Two ways to model compounds in three dimensions is by using ball and stick models and space filling models. Asked in dodge ball what are the advantages.
Poor representation of actual bonds and atoms. Ball and stick models show the overall shape of a molecule and space filling models. The ball and stick model is helpful in understanding the structure of molecules and how they form bonds. A ball and stick model is a molecular model of a chemical substance displaying the three dimensional position of the atoms and the bonds between them.
What are the advantages disadvantages of the ball and stick model. Space fill models are similar to ball and stick models in that they are three dimensional models that represent atoms as colored spheres. Atoms bonds single double or triple and general shape visible disadvantages. In chemistry for example structural formulas and ball and stick models are unrealistic depictions of molecules.
The sphere colors commonly follow the cpk coloring some university courses on chemistry require students to buy such models as learning material. In cases like these the simpler model may actually be superior because it gives you a way to visualize a process so you can understand it and make predictions about it.